Veille ufologique américaine
Remote Viewing PracticeAnnouncing A New Website to Develop RV Skillsby James Walsh <(Copyright 2010, James Walsh. All Rights Reserved) ><Edited by Robert D. Morningstar>Dated: 15:27 March 4, 2010The official Department of Defence definition of Remote Viewing was: "The learned ability to transcend space and time, to view persons, places or things remote in space and time; to gather and report information on the same."The phrase and associated technique(s) were made famous through media coverage in 1995, when details of a CIA project called Stargate were declassified. Since 1995 former Military Intelligence Officers have started teaching this skill to civilians. Recently a new web site has been launched to help people practice and share their experiences online. The site, called RvWebby, is located at: www.wonkle.co.uk/Remote_ViewingRemote Viewing is performed on a set of target co-ordinates which represent the target. The actual target details are never revealed to the remote viewer until the session is completed. There are many techniques developed over the years to perform a remote viewing session. The RvWebby web site helps people practice the techniques.The web site has been created by James Walsh, an IT developer from England, UK, who has an ongoing interest in remote viewing and wishes to promote practice the RV techniques. Unable to find a practice "target pool" varied enough to satisfy his needs, he decided to implement his knowledge of protocols and methods into an IT solution.The web site was first released in January 2010. Since then an experienced group of Remote Viewers from Australia called Remote Viewing Unit have provided guidance and support developing the functionality of the web site. The Remote Viewing Unit (in Australia) was founded by Rick and Sandra Hilleard, who received their training in the USA, under the guidance of former Military Remote Viewers, who instructed them in:1. Coordinate Remote Viewing; 2. Technical Remote Viewing;3. Extended Remote Viewing. They are currently the only Remote Viewing Trainers in Australia. The Remote Viewing Unit plans to use RV Webby’s online application to support their students with practice and guidance after training and to calibrate and fine tune professional remote viewers.The web site functionality for public users includes:Public target generatorDynamic target pool that is open to submission from membersModeration of the target submissions to protect remote viewers from disturbing experiencesTarget locations described using any or all of the following methods: o YouTube video o Interactive Google map location o Key features o Text description o Uploaded imageUsers are welcome to register with the web site. Membership to the web site is totally free. When users register they gain access to many more features. These features include:Submitting targets to the target poolKeeping a history of remote viewing sessionsScoring other users sessionsHaving other users score your sessionsAbility to make their profile public and display sessions that scored 3 or more. These sessions can be viewed from the menu link RV Sessions.James WalshEngland, UKMarch 3rd, 2010
An Experiment In Remote Viewing: The Search For Life On Marsby Kathlynne Kasten Posted: 19:09 April 12, 2010Kathlynne KastenSUMMARY :This paper presents information regarding the possibility of life on Mars derived from a single remote viewing session lasting 43 minutes on 11/30-12/01/96 starting at 12:30 AM, and a second session using a technique utilized by dowsers - that is, using a specially designed pendulum. Also included, is a description of the area that came into focus during the remote viewing session and the images that appeared. The target area, a “dark green” area, was pre-sited prior to the remote viewing session.BACKGROUND :As a consequence of Vince DiPietro’s interview on Art Bell’s radio show on 11/30-12/01/96, I decided to see if I could remote view the planet Mars to search for “life.” I had scored hits with other targets in past experiences. A discussion of these targets and those sessions are outside the scope of this paper. I have a passing amateur’s interest in astronomy, and training in empirical data collection in the field of archaeology.PART I :The remote viewing session: The target context was “look for life on Mars.” There is always a mental parameter determined before starting a remote viewing session, this is to aide in focusing on a target. The first image that appeared was Mars at a distance of perhaps an orbiting space craft. Just to the right of my high orbit view was a large dark spot on the surface of Mars. I did not move directly toward the large dark spot but towards the north polar region to begin surface orientation. Skirting the polar region, and moving approximately a little over 1/3 of the surface of the planet toward the south; passing what I “felt” was the equator, I stopped over a large area. Upon closer view, the area was mottled in color and looked to be covered in a bramble-type “plant.” Focusing on the bramble (see attached drawing), I noticed that it consisted of bulbous extrusions on braciated ground cover. It is dark in color and filled with light/almost white/luminous liquid which changes color when “the sap is running.” It seems all/most of the branches are connected to each other. That is, if one piece were to cut off, eventually all the liquid would drain off, and the organism would die.12/02/96: I contacted Vince DiPietro by e-mail on Monday with a request/hope that after the Mars Lander photographic material is released I would find out whether my remote viewing data could be confirmed.12/31/96: I received return e-mail from Vince DiPietro in which he suggested an area on Mars which might support life; he provided coordinates for an area which he claimed had a “water spout.” Further, he stated that the water spout was cited at -16o latitude and 80o longitude. Because DiPietro knew about this “water spout” feature, he told he had suggested to JPL that Sojourner land in that area, and he provided the reasons he gave to JPL for doing so.1/13/97: My return e-mail to DiPietro stated that I was not aware there was a water spout on Mars; that the description of the conditions around a water spout could provide a nice warm environment for bacteria or mold, a possible description of what I saw; stated that I had downloaded a hand drawn (possibly from photographs) map of Mars from the University of Hawaii’s website. I further stated that while looking at the map, I remembered that the area I saw was very flat, not red-colored as the surrounding area. Also, the flat horizon was broken here and there by a large “mesa”-type outcroppings on only one side of my 360o field of view.PART II :At the second session, I utilized a time honored method called dowsing (using a special balanced, finely machined, brass pendulum shaped like an Egyptian djed pole with a pointed end, hung from a very strong cord - made especially for pendulum work). I am sure you are a bit concerned about using dowsing as part of a scientific method, be assured that some top professional archaeologists I know have used this method (although did not disclosed this fact publicly least their professional reputations be called into question). I am comfortable with this method, and have scored a high percentage of hits. In other words, I have confidence in the method.1/19/97: I laid out the map of Mars on a flat surface, and using the stored images in my memory from the remote viewing session, I proceeded to go over the map from top to bottom and right to left holding the pendulum as close to the surface as possible without interfering with it’s swing.It is my understanding that the “water spout” is located at -16o latitude, 80o longitude. I cannot account for the discrepancy in the location except to say perhaps the original cited location was made before there were more accurate maps of Mars, or I am sensing the wrong location, or the map itself is not precise. I feel this problem will be reconciled once the new Mars data arrives in the autumn of 1997.Description of Area #2: During this second session, i.e., the work with the pendulum and the U of H map of Mars, I located a second possible area for life at (minus) -63o latitude, 304o longitude. This area is smaller than area #1 and roughly ovoid in shape. As I did not pick up this second area during the remote viewing session of 11/30-12/01/96, I have since gone back and done a second very short remote viewing session of the area. It appears to be a white crystalline natural ground structure of very small rods or ovoid “pebbles.”A Possible Future Use for Remote Viewing: As this was a new type of remote viewing session for me, I would like very much to discover if it is of any value for the future, i.e., as a means of exploration without leaving the surface of Earth. Perhaps, if this method proves useful, it will become possible to remote view an area, in conjunction with photographic data and accurate maps, before spending the moneys and effort to send a space vehicle to explore a targeted area.ATTACHMENTS :Drawings of braciated “plant” life; shape of areas.
Freeman expose StarWars (Alien agenda)The FreeZone Radio show - Alien Agenda unfoldingEmission du 09 Octobre 2010http://www.freemantv.com/
